Michelle Kamhi
  • Home
  • About MMK
    • Biography
    • Key Publications by MMK
    • Media/News
  • Who Says That’s Art?
    • About the Book
    • Contents
    • Introductory Chapter
    • Images of Works Cited
    • Review Excerpts
    • What Readers Say
    • Artworld Myths Debunked
    • Honors
    • Supporters
    • Where to Buy Who Says That’s Art?
  • Bucking the Artworld
    • About the Book
    • Preface
    • Images of Works Cited
    • Reviews
    • Publicity
  • Blog
  • Other Work
    • On Art Education
    • What Art Is
    • Aristos
  • Contact
  • Search

Subscribe to Blog

Lessons on Education from Books Our Children Read

September 4, 2021 / Michelle Kamhi / Education, General / 10 Comments

Print This Post Print This Post

Irate parents at school board meeting

Irate parents at Loudon County, VA, school board meeting. Yahoo! News.

Nearly four decades ago, I produced an educational film entitled Books Our Children Read.1 It documented a constructive approach to resolving parent-teacher conflict over education in a rural Ohio school district, at a time when such conflict was erupting in violence in other American communities.

The film focuses on the study of literature in the English curriculum. But the issues it deals with and the insights it offers are broadly pertinent to other areas of education. And they remain even more relevant today, when American schools are being torn apart by profound disparities between parental values and the “progressive” agenda of the education establishment.

As I wrote in the Study Guide to the film,

What sort of education is possible in an environment of confrontation? Can meaningful education occur if . . . parents feel that their deepest convictions and values may be undermined in the classroom? Can children caught between loyalty to family and identification with school feel other than confused?

In that connection, it is worth remembering the following observations by Thomas Jefferson, quoted in the Books Our Children Read study guide:

To compel a man to [support] the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.

[I]t is better to tolerate the rare instance of a parent refusing to let his child be educated, than to shock the common feelings and ideas by the forcible . . . education of the infant against the will of the father.

I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education.

Who Should Be Teaching Whom?

Recent trends have cast doubt on the assumption that education is exclusively from the top down, because those officially charged with teaching the next generation often seem alarmingly devoid of what Jefferson alluded to as “wholesome discretion.”2

With respect to the issues now roiling American schools—from transgenderism to racism—the view expressed several decades ago by Professor Allan Glatthorn, in the book Dealing with Censorship, remains especially relevant. As further noted in the film’s study guide, he rightly argued that “dialog between schools and the communities [they serve] needs to go far beyond the patronizing condescension and manipulation that too often pass for school public relations.” In his clear-sighted view:

[T]eachers need to show more acceptance and respect for values other than our own. Most of us are intellectuals who see ourselves as liberated, but too often such intellectual independence becomes distorted into a smug conviction that the traditional values of church, country, and family are childish aberrations that must be corrected.

Glatthorn’s sage advice applies equally to today’s school boards and administrators, whose heavy-handed imposition of misguided “progressive” attitudes and policies is being opposed with justified ire by the parents whose children are entrusted to their educational supervision.

Notes

  1. Readers who would like to view a clearer print of the film than that on Vimeo can search for it in libraries on WorldCat. ↩
  2. Regarding dubious ideas all too readily embraced and promoted by today’s education establishment, see “Canary in the Coal Mine of America’s Future,” American Greatness, August 21, 2021; and “Poisoning the Well of Art Education,” Academic Questions, Fall 2021. ↩
A Day No Pigs Would Die, Allan Glatthorn, conservative values, controversial literature, parents vs. teachers

10 comments on “Lessons on Education from Books Our Children Read”

  1. Michelle Kamhi says:
    September 4, 2021 at 4:02 pm

    Contrary to William’s confused claim (see below, at 3:52 pm), transgender females are male at birth and are therefore males biologically. Moreover, they retain some male characteristics even after hormone treatment.

    Reply
  2. William Conger says:
    September 4, 2021 at 12:09 pm

    It is reasonable to expect educators to strengthen the moral and ethical values of their students’ communities. But that assumes a basic trust in informed community opinion and knowledge. Today, the conflicts between parents and teachers center on whether or not science, and the scientific method, can withstand attacks from a broad range of anti-science (anti rational) parent-antagonists. When violent solipsistic beliefs oppose rational inquiry, an educational process is impossible. The best education inspires curiosity and provides access to knowledge through rational, critical thinking. It only opposes ignorance.

    Reply
    • Michelle Kamhi says:
      September 4, 2021 at 1:23 pm

      You’re gravely mistaken in thinking that today’s conflicts center on science and the scientific method, William. They mainly pertain to ethical, moral, political, and social issues such as transgenderism and racism—all stemming from neo-Marxist identity politics.

      Reply
  3. Taffy Gould says:
    September 4, 2021 at 12:01 pm

    The takeover of the US Education system was a long and well-defined Plan, based on Marxist philosophy and Saul Alinsky Rules, and it has been horribly, devastatingly, and destructively successful. As termites undermine the very foundation of a building, these miscreants have undermined America. Will we ever recover? Must we first close all the schools?

    Reply
    • Michelle Kamhi says:
      September 4, 2021 at 1:11 pm

      All too true, Taffy. We can only hope that the recent surge of parental involvement may turn the tide.

      Reply
    • William Conger says:
      September 4, 2021 at 2:53 pm

      All these extremist adjectives tilt any sensible debate! Michelle has a bag full of handy, alarming adjectives. For instance, she says I’m “gravely”mistaken. Taffy uses similar doomsday words. But OK, on the faddish trend to actually encourage transgenderism, this old progressive agrees with the alarmists. There is a tolerant middle ground that facilitates debate and smart, sensible people across the spectrum need to speak up. Screaming and cursing at school boards and teachers is silly.

      Reply
      • Michelle Kamhi says:
        September 4, 2021 at 3:07 pm

        Gravely = “extremely seriously” and is entirely justifiable in the context, William, given the social consequences of the conflict. Moreover, the “screaming and cursing” are understandable in response to the arrogant intransigence of some school boards.

        Reply
      • William Conger says:
        September 4, 2021 at 3:10 pm

        I add this. I am professor emeritus at a top research university where I never encountered a dumb, gravely ignorant student. If alarmists want to close the schools to keep their kids away from all challenging ideas, then their kids will never get to the top schools where they would have the chance to steer the discourse.

        Reply
        • Michelle Kamhi says:
          September 4, 2021 at 3:46 pm

          William, your comment here ignores what is actually going on in America’s schools—where woke “progressives” are promoting such as “challenging” (anti-science) ideas as arguing that math standards are racist and denying that biological reality gives trans women and girls an unfair advantage in women’s sports.

          Reply
          • William Conger says:
            September 4, 2021 at 3:52 pm

            I’ll just respond to your comment thst transgender girls have a biological advantage in sports. Until they have hormonal injections transgender girls are still girls in all biological ways.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to receive notice of new posts.

Return to Blog

About ‘For Piero’s Sake’

Who was Piero, and why was this title chosen? Read here.

Recent Posts

  • Kenneth M. Lansing, 1925–2022:
    A Voice in the Wilderness of Art Education
  • Art Education Update
  • Honoring America’s Promissory Note
  • Debunking Jasper Johns
  • Delving into an Incomparable Work of Renaissance Portraiture

Share This Website

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Share on google
Google
Share on email
Email

Archives

  • February 2023
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • June 2020
  • January 2020
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014

{*} ©2023 Michelle Kamhi :: Site by KPFdigital :: Admin Login

Cleantalk Pixel